Usage Score
23
Player Dossier
2015-2018Michigan State
WR • 6'4" • 195 lbs • Richmond, VA, USA
Felton Davis III reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23
Efficiency
93.3
Consistency
91.9
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Felton Davis III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Michigan State. Felton Davis III reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 474 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
79
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
23
Consistency
91.9
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 69. Arizona State: 64. Indiana: 79. Central Michigan: 66. Northwestern: 96. Penn State: 100
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 5 by 85.3. Indiana: 5 by 100. Central Michigan: 3 by 100. Northwestern: 7 by 91.4. Penn State: 8 by 83.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 50 | 100 | 5.8 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 50 | 100 | 5.8 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 150 | 84.9 | 12 | 100 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 776 | 81.1 | 24.1 | 626 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 776 | 81.1 | 24.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 474 | 93.3 | 23 | -302 |
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
181
Primary metric
181 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#5
Alabama
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Michigan State
474 primary output · 93.3 efficiency · 23 usage
69.4
#2
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
66.4
776 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 24.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Michigan State
66.4
776 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 24.1 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8744
Highland Springs · Highland Springs, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,450
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Felton Davis III quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit