Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2015-2020Bowling Green
TE • 6'5" • 248 lbs • Shadyside, OH, USA
Austin Dorris reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.3
Efficiency
58.8
Consistency
56.2
Season Value
56.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Dorris, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Austin Dorris reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Austin Dorris played TE for Indiana and Bowling Green. Across 6 tracked seasons, Austin Dorris recorded 143 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Bowling Green.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 127 primary output with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Indiana, Bowling Green.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
14.1
Efficiency
58.8
Usage
10.3
Consistency
56.2
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 13. Kansas State: 2. Louisiana Tech: 8. Kent State: 18. Toledo: 12. Central Michigan: 40. Akron: 9. Ohio: 9. Buffalo: 16
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 43.3. Kansas State: 1 by 13.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 53.3. Kent State: 2 by 60. Toledo: 1 by 80. Central Michigan: 3 by 88.9. Akron: 1 by 60. Ohio: 2 by 30. Buffalo: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Buffalo | L 7-49 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/20 | vs Ohio | L 24-66 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Akron | W 35-6 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Central Michigan | L 20-38 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Toledo | W 20-7 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Kent State | L 20-62 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 7-35 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kansas State | L 0-52 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2015-2018
Opening stop
Bowling Green
2019-2020
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Indiana | 16 | 28.3 | 4 | 16 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 127 | 58.8 | 10.3 | 111 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | -127 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Primary metric
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green
127 primary output · 58.8 efficiency · 10.3 usage
56.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Indiana
24.4
16 primary · 28.3 efficiency · 4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Indiana
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8342
Shadyside · Shadyside, OH
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
143
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.