Player Stats

Jordan Howard College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
73
Rushing yards
73

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonUtah00000-
2016 Regular SeasonUtah132320067.1
2017 PostseasonUtah5660054.3
2017 Regular SeasonUtah535350054.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

Utah paired 32 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 41.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Loss with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Utah

Games

5

Scrimmage Yards / G

8.2

Efficiency

41.1

Usage

3.4

Consistency

66.2

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 6. North Dakota: 9. San José State: 15. Arizona State: 11. Washington State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 2 by 31.3. North Dakota: 2 by 46.9. San José State: 5 by 31.3. Arizona State: 1 by 95.8. Washington State: 1 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins10 · Games = 3 · +4.5 vs Losses
Losses5.5 · Games = 2 · -4.5 vs Wins