Usage Score
3.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Alabama
Kendall Sheffield
CB • 6'0" • 193 lbs • Missouri City, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kendall Sheffield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Efficiency
19
Consistency
59.2
Season Value
28.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio State
151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Alabama • Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendall Sheffield, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio State. Kendall Sheffield shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Ohio State paired 12 primary output with 19 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 19 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Ohio State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
19
Usage
3.6
Consistency
59.2
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 1. Oregon State: 2. Rutgers: 2. TCU: 1. Tulane: 1. Penn State: 1. Indiana: 2. Minnesota: 1. Purdue: 0. Nebraska: 0. Michigan State: 0. Maryland: 0. Michigan: 0. Northwestern: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 5 by 30.8. Oregon State: 4 by 36.7. Rutgers: 0 by 20. TCU: 5 by 30.8. Tulane: 0 by 10. Penn State: 2 by 18.3. Indiana: 1 by 24.2. Minnesota: 1 by 14.2. Purdue: 2 by 8.3. Nebraska: 2 by 8.3. Michigan State: 4 by 16.7. Maryland: 4 by 16.7. Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Northwestern: 1 by 14.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=13
First Half1.4 · n=7 · +1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=7 · -1.1 vs First Half
All Games0.9 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Washington | W 28-23 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Northwestern | W 45-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Michigan | W 62-39 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Maryland | W 52-51 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Michigan State | W 26-6 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Nebraska | W 36-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Purdue | L 20-49 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Minnesota | W 30-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Indiana | W 49-26 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Penn State | W 27-26 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Tulane | W 49-6 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/16 | @ TCU | W 40-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Rutgers | W 52-3 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Oregon State | W 77-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2015
Opening stop
- 2
Ohio State
2016-2018
Final stop
Season Progression
201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 11 | 21.3 | 2.6 | 11 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 11 | 21.3 | 2.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 12 | 19 | 3.6 | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 12 | 19 | 3.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#2
Oregon State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#3
Rutgers
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.9 takeover score.
#4
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.8 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 31.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
12 primary output · 19 efficiency · 3.6 usage
28.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Ohio State
28.3
12 primary · 19 efficiency · 3.6 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Ohio State
16.4
11 primary · 21.3 efficiency · 2.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.99
Fort Bend Marshall · Missouri City, TX
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
75
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.