Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2015-2019South Carolina
Kyle Markway
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Saint Louis, MO, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kyle Markway reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.2
Consistency
71.2
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · South Carolina
1516171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- South Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Markway, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · South Carolina. Kyle Markway reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
South Carolina paired 349 primary output with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · South Carolina
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
31.7
Efficiency
74.2
Usage
12.5
Consistency
71.2
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 37. Unknown: 37. Alabama: 46. Missouri: 52. Georgia: 5. Florida: 8. Tennessee: 16. Vanderbilt: 19. App State: 43. Texas A&M: 47. Clemson: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 2 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 61.7. Alabama: 5 by 61.3. Missouri: 3 by 100. Georgia: 1 by 33.3. Florida: 1 by 53.3. Tennessee: 1 by 100. Vanderbilt: 1 by 100. App State: 5 by 57.3. Texas A&M: 5 by 62.7. Clemson: 3 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins12 · Games = 2 · -24 vs Losses
Losses36 · Games = 8 · +24 vs Wins
First Half30.8 · Games = 6 · -2.0 vs Second Half
Second Half32.8 · Games = 5 · +2.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Clemson | L 3-38 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Texas A&M | L 6-30 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs App State | L 15-20 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Vanderbilt | W 24-7 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tennessee | L 21-41 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Florida | L 27-38 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Georgia | W 20-17 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Missouri | L 14-34 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Alabama | L 23-47 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ North Carolina | L 20-24 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Carolina
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | South Carolina | 57 | 97.8 | 6.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | -57 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | South Carolina | 53 | 82.2 | 4.6 | 53 |
| 2019 Regular Season | South Carolina | 349 | 74.2 | 12.5 | 296 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52
Primary metric
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Missouri
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Carolina
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · South Carolina
349 primary output · 74.2 efficiency · 12.5 usage
64.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · South Carolina
48.5
57 primary · 97.8 efficiency · 6.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · South Carolina
34.3
53 primary · 82.2 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9149
Westlake · Atlanta, GA
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
459
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.