Player Stats

Ronnie Hoggins College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
187
TFL
5
Sacks
0.5
Passes defended
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Florida20-0--045.3
2016 PostseasonSouth Florida105-0--049.4
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Florida104810-3049.4
2017 PostseasonSouth Florida129-0-2049.7
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Florida1244-0-6049.7
2018 PostseasonSouth Florida136-0--060.7
2018 Regular SeasonSouth Florida137540.5-6060.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

South Florida paired 12.5 primary output with 35.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 35.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · South Florida

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

35.3

Usage

6.6

Consistency

53.1

Best Game by takeover score

Cincinnati

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 0. Elon: 0. Georgia Tech: 1.5. Illinois: 0.5. East Carolina: 1. Massachusetts: 0.5. Tulsa: 3. UConn: 1. Houston: 0. Tulane: 1. Cincinnati: 2. Temple: 2. UCF: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 6 by 25. Elon: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Tech: 9 by 52.5. Illinois: 11 by 50.8. East Carolina: 4 by 26.7. Massachusetts: 6 by 30. Tulsa: 4 by 46.7. UConn: 5 by 30.8. Houston: 6 by 25. Tulane: 4 by 26.7. Cincinnati: 13 by 70. Temple: 7 by 49.2. UCF: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.1 · Games = 7 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Wins