Usage Score
3.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Texas State
Anthony J. Taylor
CB • 5'8" • 185 lbs • Tyler, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Anthony J. Taylor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.9
Consistency
62.3
Season Value
31
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas State
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony J. Taylor, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Texas State. Anthony J. Taylor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Texas State paired 14 primary output with 24.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 24.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Texas State
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
24.9
Usage
3.6
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 1. Wyoming: 2. SMU: 0. Georgia State: 2. Unknown: 2. UL Monroe: 2. Arkansas State: 0. South Alabama: 1. Troy: 2. App State: 2. Coastal Carolina: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 1 by 14.2. Wyoming: 3 by 32.5. SMU: 4 by 16.7. Georgia State: 2 by 28.3. Unknown: 4 by 36.7. UL Monroe: 4 by 36.7. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2. South Alabama: 2 by 18.3. Troy: 7 by 49.2. App State: 2 by 28.3. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.5 · Games = 2 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 8 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.5 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Troy
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Troy
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 21-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ App State | L 13-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Troy | L 27-63 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs South Alabama | W 30-28 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Arkansas State | L 14-38 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/11 | vs UL Monroe | L 14-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Georgia State | W 37-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ SMU | L 17-47 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Wyoming | L 14-23 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 7-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas State | 2.5 | 15.3 | 3.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas State | 5 | 22.2 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas State | 6.5 | 18.3 | 3.7 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas State | 14 | 24.9 | 3.6 | 7.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Troy
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
#2
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#3
Wyoming
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#5
UL Monroe
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Texas State
14 primary output · 24.9 efficiency · 3.6 usage
31
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas State
21.2
6.5 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 3.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Texas State
11.9
5 primary · 22.2 efficiency · 2.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7889
Guyer · Denton, TX
- Committed To
- Texas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
132
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.