Player Stats

Jeff Gemmell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
287
TFL
21
Sacks
6
QB hurries
12
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonCharlotte1027-01-09.4
2017 Regular SeasonCharlotte121067.514-063.9
2018 Regular SeasonCharlotte11799471081.5
2019 PostseasonCharlotte116-0--051.7
2019 Regular SeasonCharlotte11694.51-2051.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Charlotte paired 22 primary output with 49.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 36.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Marshall

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Charlotte

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

36.1

Usage

9.2

Consistency

55.2

Best Game by takeover score

Marshall

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 0. Gardner-Webb: 0. App State: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Florida Atlantic: 1. Florida International: 1. Western Kentucky: 0.5. North Texas: 1.5. Middle Tennessee: 1. UTEP: 1.5. Marshall: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 6 by 25. Gardner-Webb: 6 by 25. App State: 9 by 37.5. Massachusetts: 1 by 4.2. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 22.5. Florida International: 6 by 35. Western Kentucky: 5 by 25.8. North Texas: 12 by 65. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 39.2. UTEP: 10 by 56.7. Marshall: 10 by 61.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs Wins