Player Stats

Kevin Murphy College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
45
TFL
2
Sacks
0.5
QB hurries
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonUConn00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonUConn680.50.5--015.4
2017 Regular SeasonUConn813-01-015
2018 Regular SeasonUConn8110.50--026.7
2019 PostseasonLouisiana Tech71-01-037.6
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech712101-037.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Louisiana Tech paired 3 primary output with 12 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 12 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UConn, Louisiana Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Louisiana Tech

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

12

Usage

2.9

Consistency

14.3

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. Rice: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Southern Miss: 1. UTEP: 1. Marshall: 0. UTSA: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 1 by 14.2. Rice: 3 by 12.5. Massachusetts: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 3 by 22.5. UTEP: 2 by 18.3. Marshall: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -0.5 vs Wins