Player Stats

Jesse Osuna College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
163
TFL
17
Sacks
5
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonSan José State00-0--0-
2017 Regular SeasonSan José State36-0--039.7
2018 Regular SeasonSan José State129310241072.5
2019 Regular SeasonSan José State10647311057.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

San José State paired 19 primary output with 47.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 37.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Army

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · San José State

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.2

Efficiency

37.4

Usage

10.8

Consistency

37.5

Best Game by takeover score

Army

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northern Colorado: 3. Tulsa: 1. Arkansas: 1. Air Force: 0.5. New Mexico: 0. Nevada: 0.5. Army: 4. Boise State: 0. UNLV: 2. Fresno State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Colorado: 8 by 63.3. Tulsa: 4 by 26.7. Arkansas: 4 by 26.7. Air Force: 10 by 46.7. New Mexico: 2 by 8.3. Nevada: 8 by 38.3. Army: 15 by 90. Boise State: 2 by 8.3. UNLV: 8 by 53.3. Fresno State: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 5 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs Wins