Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Florida International
Austin Maloney
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Austin Maloney reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93.3
Consistency
44.7
Season Value
63.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Florida International
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Florida International
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Maloney, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Florida International. Austin Maloney reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Florida International paired 610 primary output with 91.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Florida International
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
53.3
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
17.5
Consistency
44.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 178. Tulane: 45. Western Kentucky: 12. Unknown: 37. Louisiana Tech: 113. Massachusetts: 47. Charlotte: 73. UTEP: 11. Middle Tennessee: 28. Old Dominion: 12. Florida Atlantic: 0. Marshall: 83
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 10 by 100. Tulane: 2 by 100. Western Kentucky: 1 by 80. Unknown: 2 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 4 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 73.3. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 93.3. Old Dominion: 1 by 80. Marshall: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins35.8 · n=4 · -29.8 vs Losses
Losses65.6 · n=7 · +29.8 vs Wins
First Half72 · n=6 · +37.5 vs Second Half
Second Half34.5 · n=6 · -37.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Arkansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 26-34 | — | 10 | 178 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Marshall | L 27-30 | — | 3 | 83 | 27.7 | 27.70 | 0 | 59 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 7-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Old Dominion | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 17-50 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UTEP | W 32-17 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Charlotte | W 48-23 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Massachusetts | W 44-0 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards | L 31-43 | — | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Kentucky | L 14-20 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Tulane | L 14-42 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 35 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida International
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Florida International | 185 | 54.5 | 17.5 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Florida International | 304 | 77.7 | 10.7 | 119 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Florida International | 304 | 77.7 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Florida International | 610 | 91.2 | 13.3 | 306 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Florida International | 610 | 91.2 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Florida International | 639 | 93.3 | 17.5 | 29 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Florida International | 639 | 93.3 | 17.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178
Primary metric
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#3
Charlotte
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Florida International
610 primary output · 91.2 efficiency · 13.3 usage
69
#2
2018 Regular Season · Florida International
69
610 primary · 91.2 efficiency · 13.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Florida International
63.9
639 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 17.5 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7897
Columbus · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Florida International
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,738
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.