Player Stats

Justin Strnad College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
244
TFL
22.5
Sacks
8
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonWake Forest819-0--042.3
2017 PostseasonWake Forest13101.51-1056.7
2017 Regular SeasonWake Forest134173.51-056.7
2018 PostseasonWake Forest131110--070.9
2018 Regular SeasonWake Forest13947.51.525070.9
2019 Regular SeasonWake Forest7695.5214075.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Wake Forest paired 13.5 primary output with 58 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 58 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Wake Forest

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

1.9

Efficiency

58

Usage

12.8

Consistency

68.1

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 2. Rice: 2.5. North Carolina: 3. Elon: 3.5. Boston College: 2.5. Louisville: 0. Florida State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 12 by 70. Rice: 7 by 54.2. North Carolina: 15 by 80. Elon: 6 by 60. Boston College: 13 by 75. Louisville: 9 by 37.5. Florida State: 7 by 29.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.3 · Games = 6 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -2.3 vs Wins