Player Stats

Matt Colburn College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,850
Rushing yards
2,544
Receiving yards
306
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonWake Forest102392390141.4
2016 PostseasonWake Forest13816021160.8
2016 Regular SeasonWake Forest13688566122160.8
2017 PostseasonWake Forest131581508161.2
2017 Regular SeasonWake Forest1381375459661.2
2018 PostseasonWake Forest11746113063.1
2018 Regular SeasonWake Forest1179771483563.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Wake Forest paired 871 primary output with 45.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisville

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Wake Forest

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

79.2

Efficiency

45.4

Usage

22.2

Consistency

53.8

Best Game by takeover score

Louisville

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 74. Tulane: 48. Towson: 72. Boston College: 133. Notre Dame: 32. Rice: 34. Clemson: 27. Florida State: 113. Louisville: 243. Syracuse: 67. NC State: 28

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 17 by 45.4. Tulane: 13 by 38.5. Towson: 13 by 47.6. Boston College: 25 by 54. Notre Dame: 10 by 33.3. Rice: 8 by 44.3. Clemson: 12 by 23.4. Florida State: 25 by 40. Louisville: 20 by 100. Syracuse: 15 by 46.5. NC State: 11 by 26.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins83.2 · Games = 6 · +8.8 vs Losses
Losses74.4 · Games = 5 · -8.8 vs Wins