Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 871 primary output with 45.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 10 | 239 | 239 | 0 | 1 | 41.4 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 13 | 81 | 60 | 21 | 1 | 60.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 13 | 688 | 566 | 122 | 1 | 60.8 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wake Forest | 13 | 158 | 150 | 8 | 1 | 61.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 13 | 813 | 754 | 59 | 6 | 61.2 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wake Forest | 11 | 74 | 61 | 13 | 0 | 63.1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 11 | 797 | 714 | 83 | 5 | 63.1 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 871 primary output with 45.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
79.2
Efficiency
45.4
Usage
22.2
Consistency
53.8
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 74. Tulane: 48. Towson: 72. Boston College: 133. Notre Dame: 32. Rice: 34. Clemson: 27. Florida State: 113. Louisville: 243. Syracuse: 67. NC State: 28
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 17 by 45.4. Tulane: 13 by 38.5. Towson: 13 by 47.6. Boston College: 25 by 54. Notre Dame: 10 by 33.3. Rice: 8 by 44.3. Clemson: 12 by 23.4. Florida State: 25 by 40. Louisville: 20 by 100. Syracuse: 15 by 46.5. NC State: 11 by 26.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.