Player Stats

Kevin Prosser College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
83
TFL
19
Sacks
10.5
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
4
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonWyoming00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonWyoming14311--067.1
2016 Regular SeasonWyoming1433105.54-067.1
2017 PostseasonWyoming92-0--043
2017 Regular SeasonWyoming93252.522243
2018 Regular SeasonWyoming61331.5-2034.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Wyoming paired 21.5 primary output with 26.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 19.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Wyoming

Games

6

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

19.9

Usage

6

Consistency

39.7

Best Game by takeover score

New Mexico

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 1. Boise State: 0.5. Fresno State: 0. San José State: 2. Air Force: 0. New Mexico: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 3 by 22.5. Boise State: 1 by 9.2. Fresno State: 2 by 8.3. San José State: 4 by 36.7. Air Force: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico: 2 by 38.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.5 · Games = 4 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 2 · -1.3 vs Wins