Player Stats

James Price College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
895
Receptions
64
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonWyoming612143156.7
2016 Regular SeasonWyoming5675051.1
2017 PostseasonWyoming10212060.5
2017 Regular SeasonWyoming1018270160.5
2018 Regular SeasonWyoming1026395182.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Wyoming paired 395 primary output with 77.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 77.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 70th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Wyoming

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

39.5

Efficiency

77.2

Usage

24.5

Consistency

70.1

Best Game by takeover score

Colorado State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 23. Missouri: 55. Wofford: 43. Boise State: 77. Hawai'i: 38. Fresno State: 27. Utah State: 22. Colorado State: 50. Air Force: 54. New Mexico: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 2 by 76.7. Missouri: 1 by 100. Wofford: 4 by 71.7. Boise State: 2 by 100. Hawai'i: 3 by 84.4. Fresno State: 3 by 60. Utah State: 3 by 48.9. Colorado State: 3 by 100. Air Force: 4 by 90. New Mexico: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38.3 · Games = 4 · -2.1 vs Losses
Losses40.3 · Games = 6 · +2.1 vs Wins