Usage Score
18.6
Player Dossier
2015-2019Wyoming
Josh Harshman
TE • 6'3" • 230 lbs • Casper, WY, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Josh Harshman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.1
Consistency
43.8
Season Value
58.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wyoming
15161617181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wyoming
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Harshman, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wyoming. Josh Harshman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Josh Harshman played TE for Wyoming. Across 5 tracked seasons, Josh Harshman recorded 510 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Wyoming.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Wyoming paired 264 primary output with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Wyoming
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
29.3
Efficiency
70.1
Usage
18.6
Consistency
43.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia State: 5. Texas State: 14. UNLV: 56. New Mexico: 20. Nevada: 7. Boise State: 48. Utah State: 76. Colorado State: 8. Air Force: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia State: 1 by 33.3. Texas State: 1 by 93.3. UNLV: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 2 by 66.7. Nevada: 1 by 46.7. Boise State: 6 by 53.3. Utah State: 6 by 84.4. Colorado State: 1 by 53.3. Air Force: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins18.3 · Games = 6 · -33 vs Losses
Losses51.3 · Games = 3 · +33 vs Wins
First Half20.4 · Games = 5 · -20.1 vs Second Half
Second Half40.5 · Games = 4 · +20.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | @ Georgia State | W 38-17 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Air Force | L 6-20 | — | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Colorado State | W 17-7 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Utah State | L 21-26 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Boise State | L 17-20 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Nevada | W 31-3 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs New Mexico | W 23-10 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 9/29 | vs UNLV | W 53-17 | — | 1 | 56 | 56 | 56 | 1 | 56 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Texas State | W 23-14 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wyoming
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Wyoming | 39 | 93.4 | 3.7 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Wyoming | 50 | 58.3 | 7 | 11 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wyoming | 50 | 58.3 | 7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wyoming | 136 | 60 | 9.5 | 86 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wyoming | 21 | 32.3 | 15.4 | -115 |
| 2019 Postseason | Wyoming | 264 | 70.1 | 18.6 | 243 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wyoming | 264 | 70.1 | 18.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UNLV
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Wyoming
264 primary output · 70.1 efficiency · 18.6 usage
58.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Wyoming
58.1
264 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 18.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Wyoming
46
39 primary · 93.4 efficiency · 3.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7783
Natrona County · Casper, WY
- Committed To
- Wyoming
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
510
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.