Player Stats

Josh Allen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
5,822
Passing yards
5,066
Rushing yards
756
Touchdowns
57

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonWyoming2915140039.7
2016 PostseasonWyoming1423420727275.2
2016 Regular SeasonWyoming143,4812,9964853475.2
2017 PostseasonWyoming11151154-3362.3
2017 Regular SeasonWyoming111,8651,6582071862.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Wyoming paired 3,715 primary output with 63 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 58.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Gardner-Webb

Win with 328 yards of offense and 84.7 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Wyoming

Games

11

Primary Metric / G

183.3

Efficiency

58.4

Usage

26.9

Consistency

77

Best Game by takeover score

Gardner-Webb

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 151. Iowa: 164. Gardner-Webb: 328. Oregon: 89. Hawai'i: 109. Texas State: 231. Utah State: 244. Boise State: 193. New Mexico: 254. Colorado State: 198. Air Force: 55

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 27 by 56.4. Iowa: 48 by 43.4. Gardner-Webb: 32 by 84.7. Oregon: 32 by 43.6. Hawai'i: 25 by 54. Texas State: 32 by 62.3. Utah State: 42 by 60.8. Boise State: 45 by 47.4. New Mexico: 32 by 69.2. Colorado State: 32 by 64.4. Air Force: 15 by 56.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins196.3 · Games = 8 · +47.6 vs Losses
Losses148.7 · Games = 3 · -47.6 vs Wins