Player Stats

Dejonte O'Neal College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
580
Rushing yards
357
Receiving yards
223
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonFresno State356560039.7
2016 Regular SeasonFresno State4755718137.9
2017 PostseasonFresno State13-3-30049.4
2017 Regular SeasonFresno State1320710998049.4
2018 PostseasonFresno State1249841049.6
2018 Regular SeasonFresno State1219613066149.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Fresno State paired 245 primary output with 39.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 39.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i

Win with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Fresno State

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

20.4

Efficiency

39.4

Usage

7.2

Consistency

38.5

Best Game by takeover score

Hawai'i

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 49. Idaho: 41. Minnesota: 26. UCLA: 19. Toledo: 10. Nevada: 16. Wyoming: -3. New Mexico: 13. Hawai'i: 64. UNLV: 14. San José State: -4. Boise State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 4 by 75. Idaho: 5 by 84.2. Minnesota: 5 by 54.2. UCLA: 6 by 39.4. Toledo: 4 by 16.7. Nevada: 8 by 17.7. Wyoming: 1 by 0. New Mexico: 4 by 33.9. Hawai'i: 6 by 63.2. UNLV: 3 by 48.6. San José State: 3 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins19.9 · Games = 11 · -6.1 vs Losses
Losses26 · Games = 1 · +6.1 vs Wins