Player Stats

Cameron Haney College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
100
TFL
3.5
Sacks
1
Passes defended
26

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonUtah State816-0-3013
2017 Regular SeasonUtah State113120-6028.5
2018 PostseasonUtah State94-0--028.2
2018 Regular SeasonUtah State9120.50-6028.2
2019 PostseasonUtah State114-0--048.3
2019 Regular SeasonUtah State113311-11048.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Utah State paired 14 primary output with 26.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 26.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Utah State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

26.7

Usage

3.4

Consistency

38.3

Best Game by takeover score

Colorado State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 0. San Diego State: 3. Colorado State: 5. LSU: 2. Nevada: 0. Air Force: 0. BYU: 1. Fresno State: 0. Wyoming: 1. Boise State: 2. New Mexico: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 4 by 16.7. San Diego State: 4 by 46.7. Colorado State: 6 by 75. LSU: 2 by 28.3. Nevada: 2 by 8.3. Air Force: 2 by 8.3. BYU: 4 by 26.7. Fresno State: 4 by 16.7. Wyoming: 3 by 22.5. Boise State: 2 by 28.3. New Mexico: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.5 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs Wins