Usage Score
27.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Utah State
Gerold Bright
RB • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Pensacola, FL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Gerold Bright leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.1 efficiency.
Efficiency
51.1
Consistency
64.9
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Utah State
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Utah State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gerold Bright, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Utah State. Gerold Bright leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.1 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Utah State paired 1,120 primary output with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Utah State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
88.5
Efficiency
51.1
Usage
27.6
Consistency
64.9
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 117. Wake Forest: 67. Unknown: 70. San Diego State: 15. Colorado State: 198. LSU: 14. Nevada: 141. Air Force: 26. BYU: 120. Fresno State: 106. Wyoming: 100. Boise State: 50. New Mexico: 127
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 25 by 47.5. Wake Forest: 13 by 47.2. Unknown: 12 by 70.8. San Diego State: 7 by 27.7. Colorado State: 38 by 52.8. LSU: 10 by 19.9. Nevada: 17 by 84.6. Air Force: 7 by 40.5. BYU: 16 by 65.6. Fresno State: 17 by 61.2. Wyoming: 20 by 41.4. Boise State: 12 by 44.9. New Mexico: 23 by 60.2
Split Comparison
Wins114.5 · n=6 · +48.8 vs Losses
Losses65.7 · n=6 · -48.8 vs Wins
First Half88.9 · n=7 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half88.2 · n=6 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado State
Best efficiency game
84.6 vs Nevada
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Kent State | L 41-51 | 21 | 94 | 4.50 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 4.7 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ New Mexico100 rush yards | W 38-25 | 19 | 113 | 5.90 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 5.5 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Boise State | L 21-56 | 10 | 44 | 4.40 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4.2 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Wyoming | W 26-21 | 17 | 56 | 3.30 | 0 | 3 | 44 | 5 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Fresno State | W 37-35 | 14 | 79 | 5.60 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 6.2 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs BYU | L 14-42 | 12 | 66 | 5.50 | 1 | 4 | 54 | 7.5 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Air Force | L 7-31 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.7 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Nevada100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 36-10 | 15 | 126 | 8.40 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 8.3 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ LSU | L 6-42 | 8 | 18 | 2.30 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 1.4 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Colorado State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 34-24 | 36 | 179 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 5.2 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ San Diego State | W 23-17 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 2.1 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 67 | 7.40 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5.8 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Wake Forest | L 35-38 | 9 | 37 | 4.10 | 1 | 4 | 30 | 5.2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Utah State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah State | 143 | 55.5 | 3.6 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Utah State | 435 | 78.8 | 7.7 | 292 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah State | 435 | 78.8 | 7.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah State | 1,120 | 62.9 | 21.7 | 685 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah State | 1,120 | 62.9 | 21.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah State | 1,151 | 51.1 | 27.6 | 31 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah State | 1,151 | 51.1 | 27.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with 102 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
102
Primary metric
102 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
#2
New Mexico State
134
Primary metric
Win with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 21.9 usage.
#3
Nevada
75
Primary metric
Loss with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
75 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.
#4
Hawai'i
98
Primary metric
Win with 98 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
98 scrimmage yards and 17.6 usage.
#5
Hawai'i
134
Primary metric
Win with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 28.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Utah State
1,120 primary output · 62.9 efficiency · 21.7 usage
64.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Utah State
64.1
1,120 primary · 62.9 efficiency · 21.7 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Utah State
60.9
1,151 primary · 51.1 efficiency · 27.6 usage
Milestones
13
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8174
Escambia · Pensacola, FL
- Committed To
- Utah State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,849
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.