Player Stats

Devante Mays College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,242
Rushing yards
1,225
Receiving yards
17
Touchdowns
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 PostseasonUtah State131241240072.2
2015 Regular SeasonUtah State138518429972.2
2016 Regular SeasonUtah State52672598332.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Utah State paired 975 primary output with 61.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 41.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Weber State

Win with 208 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Utah State

Games

5

Scrimmage Yards / G

53.4

Efficiency

41.7

Usage

15.3

Consistency

18.5

Best Game by takeover score

Weber State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Weber State: 208. USC: 32. Air Force: 2. San Diego State: 19. Wyoming: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Weber State: 18 by 98.1. USC: 9 by 33.6. Air Force: 1 by 20.8. San Diego State: 8 by 24.7. Wyoming: 2 by 31.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins208 · Games = 1 · +193.3 vs Losses
Losses14.8 · Games = 4 · -193.3 vs Wins