Usage / Role
1%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2016Purdue
CB • 6'0" • Temple Hills, MD, USA
David Rose shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
7
Developing production for a corner
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
17
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
David Rose, CB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. David Rose shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 2 | 2 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 36.4 |
Related Context
David Rose played CB for Purdue. Across 2 tracked seasons, David Rose recorded 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
4.2
Usage
0.6
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 0. Illinois: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Illinois
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Cincinnati
Week 2 · L 20-38
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Havoc Plays
3.3 takeover
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
#2
@ Illinois
Week 6 · W 34-31 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
2.8 takeover
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 2.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
36.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.