Usage Score
14.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Purdue
Markus Bailey
LB • 6'1" • 240 lbs • Columbus, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Markus Bailey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
48
Consistency
40.4
Season Value
29.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Purdue
1617171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Markus Bailey, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Purdue. Markus Bailey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Purdue paired 3 primary output with 44.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 48 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
48
Usage
14.2
Consistency
40.4
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 0. Eastern Michigan: 4. Missouri: 0. Boston College: 4. Nebraska: 2. Illinois: 0. Ohio State: 1.5. Michigan State: 1. Iowa: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Indiana: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 9 by 37.5. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 60.8. Missouri: 5 by 20.8. Boston College: 10 by 81.7. Nebraska: 11 by 65.8. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Ohio State: 15 by 65. Michigan State: 11 by 55.8. Iowa: 8 by 33.3. Wisconsin: 11 by 45.8. Indiana: 7 by 49.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.6 · Games = 6 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half1.7 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Indiana | W 28-21 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Wisconsin10+ tackles | L 44-47 | 11 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Iowa | W 38-36 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Michigan State10+ tackles | L 13-23 | 11 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Ohio State10+ tackles | W 49-20 | 15 | 8 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Illinois | W 46-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Nebraska10+ tackles | W 42-28 | 11 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Boston College10+ tackles · Splash game | W 30-13 | 10 | 10 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Missouri | L 37-40 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Eastern MichiganSplash game | L 19-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Northwestern | L 27-31 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 12 | 43.7 | 11.9 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 21 | 44.7 | 12.4 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 21 | 44.7 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 14.5 | 48 | 14.2 | -6.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Purdue | 3 | 44.2 | 15.6 | -11.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 76 takeover score.
#2
Boston College
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 67.7 takeover score.
#3
Michigan
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.2 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.7 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Purdue
3 primary output · 44.2 efficiency · 15.6 usage
33.8
#2
2017 Postseason · Purdue
33.6
21 primary · 44.7 efficiency · 12.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
33.6
21 primary · 44.7 efficiency · 12.4 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
7
Splash games
13
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9406
Edison · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Miami
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
295
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.