Player Stats

Marcel Spears Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
272
TFL
24.5
Sacks
6
QB hurries
9
Passes defended
13
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonIowa State34-0--037.4
2017 PostseasonIowa State13112.51--065.1
2017 Regular SeasonIowa State13966013265.1
2018 PostseasonIowa State1391.50.5--069.4
2018 Regular SeasonIowa State13606.5253269.4
2019 PostseasonIowa State137-0-2065.3
2019 Regular SeasonIowa State138582.535065.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Iowa State paired 20.5 primary output with 37.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 45.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northern Iowa

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Iowa State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.6

Efficiency

45.3

Usage

9

Consistency

41.2

Best Game by takeover score

Northern Iowa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 2. Northern Iowa: 5. Iowa: 1. UL Monroe: 2. Baylor: 3. TCU: 1. West Virginia: 0. Texas Tech: 2. Oklahoma State: 1. Oklahoma: 2.5. Texas: 0. Kansas: 1. Kansas State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 7 by 49.2. Northern Iowa: 9 by 87.5. Iowa: 8 by 43.3. UL Monroe: 6 by 45. Baylor: 6 by 55. TCU: 8 by 43.3. West Virginia: 6 by 25. Texas Tech: 12 by 70. Oklahoma State: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma: 10 by 66.7. Texas: 3 by 12.5. Kansas: 7 by 39.2. Kansas State: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 7 · -0.0 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · Games = 6 · +0.0 vs Wins