Usage Score
40.1
Player Dossier
2015-2018Virginia
Olamide Zaccheaus
WR • 5'8" • 190 lbs • Planfield, NJ, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Olamide Zaccheaus reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.1
Consistency
60.7
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Virginia
151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Virginia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Olamide Zaccheaus, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Virginia. Olamide Zaccheaus reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Virginia paired 1,073 primary output with 65.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Virginia
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
82.5
Efficiency
65.1
Usage
40.1
Consistency
60.7
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 100. Unknown: 101. Indiana: 15. Ohio: 247. Louisville: 29. NC State: 109. Miami: 15. Duke: 66. North Carolina: 108. Pittsburgh: 31. Liberty: 86. Georgia Tech: 111. Virginia Tech: 55
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 12 by 55.6. Unknown: 6 by 100. Indiana: 5 by 20. Ohio: 9 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 48.3. NC State: 9 by 80.7. Miami: 3 by 33.3. Duke: 10 by 44. North Carolina: 10 by 72. Pittsburgh: 4 by 51.7. Liberty: 7 by 81.9. Georgia Tech: 11 by 67.3. Virginia Tech: 4 by 91.7
Split Comparison
Wins93 · n=7 · +28.8 vs Losses
Losses64.2 · n=5 · -28.8 vs Wins
First Half88 · n=7 · +11.8 vs Second Half
Second Half76.2 · n=6 · -11.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-0 | — | 12 | 100 | 8.5 | 8.30 | 3 | 13 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Virginia Tech | L 31-34 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Georgia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-30 | — | 11 | 111 | 9.6 | 10.10 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Liberty | W 45-24 | — | 7 | 86 | 9.2 | 12.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Fri 11/2 | vs Pittsburgh | L 13-23 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.2 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs North Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-21 | — | 10 | 108 | 11.5 | 10.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ DukeHigh volume | W 28-14 | — | 10 | 66 | 5.5 | 6.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Miami | W 16-13 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ NC State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-35 | — | 9 | 109 | 13.5 | 12.10 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Louisville | W 27-3 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-31 | — | 9 | 247 | 27.4 | 27.40 | 2 | 86 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Indiana | L 16-20 | — | 5 | 15 | 1.5 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 101 | 11.3 | 16.80 | 1 | 38 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Virginia
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Virginia | 216 | 45.2 | 9.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Virginia | 584 | 66.2 | 19 | 368 |
| 2017 Postseason | Virginia | 895 | 69.9 | 28.3 | 311 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Virginia | 895 | 69.9 | 28.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Virginia | 1,073 | 65.1 | 40.1 | 178 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Virginia | 1,073 | 65.1 | 40.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
247
Primary metric
247 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UConn
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 90.4 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Carolina
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Virginia
1,073 primary output · 65.1 efficiency · 40.1 usage
66.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Virginia
66.5
1,073 primary · 65.1 efficiency · 40.1 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Virginia
65.4
895 primary · 69.9 efficiency · 28.3 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9937
North Kansas City · Kansas City, MO
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,768
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.