Player Stats

Robert Knowles College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
83
TFL
0.5
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonMiami56-0--037.4
2017 PostseasonMiami91-0--039.9
2017 Regular SeasonMiami917-0--039.9
2018 PostseasonMiami81-0--040.3
2018 Regular SeasonMiami815-0--040.3
2019 PostseasonMiami122-0-1045
2019 Regular SeasonMiami12410.50-4045

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Miami paired 5.5 primary output with 19.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 19.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Miami

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

19.5

Usage

3.1

Consistency

34.8

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 1. Florida: 0. North Carolina: 0. Bethune-Cookman: 0.5. Central Michigan: 0. Virginia: 1. Georgia Tech: 0. Pittsburgh: 1. Florida State: 1. Louisville: 0. Florida International: 0. Duke: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 18.3. Florida: 3 by 12.5. North Carolina: 5 by 20.8. Bethune-Cookman: 2 by 13.3. Central Michigan: 7 by 29.2. Virginia: 1 by 14.2. Georgia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Pittsburgh: 3 by 22.5. Florida State: 4 by 26.7. Louisville: 7 by 29.2. Florida International: 4 by 16.7. Duke: 3 by 22.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Wins