Player Stats

Reggie Corbin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,704
Rushing yards
2,361
Receiving yards
343
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonIllinois12635523112255
2017 Regular SeasonIllinois71057827022
2018 Regular SeasonIllinois121,2611,085176976.2
2019 PostseasonIllinois1241410157.1
2019 Regular SeasonIllinois1266263428657.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Illinois paired 1,261 primary output with 72.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan

Loss with 144 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Illinois

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

58.6

Efficiency

46.8

Usage

24.2

Consistency

56.4

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. California: 41. Akron: 36. Eastern Michigan: 144. Nebraska: 134. Minnesota: 68. Michigan: 14. Wisconsin: 83. Purdue: 47. Rutgers: 51. Michigan State: 57. Iowa: 38. Northwestern: -10

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 14 by 30.5. Akron: 6 by 62.5. Eastern Michigan: 19 by 81.6. Nebraska: 20 by 69.8. Minnesota: 14 by 50.6. Michigan: 9 by 16.2. Wisconsin: 17 by 50.9. Purdue: 12 by 40.8. Rutgers: 13 by 40.9. Michigan State: 9 by 52.3. Iowa: 6 by 66. Northwestern: 7 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins54.8 · Games = 5 · -6.5 vs Losses
Losses61.3 · Games = 7 · +6.5 vs Wins