Player Stats

Terik Miller College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
103
TFL
9.5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonLouisiana105-0--015.7
2016 Regular SeasonLouisiana1016101-015.7
2017 Regular SeasonLouisiana5710--09.9
2018 PostseasonLouisiana101-0--031.2
2018 Regular SeasonLouisiana10382.5011031.2
2019 PostseasonLouisiana13810--047.4
2019 Regular SeasonLouisiana132841-3047.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Louisiana paired 9 primary output with 18.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 18.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: App State

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Louisiana

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

18.5

Usage

4.1

Consistency

36.9

Best Game by takeover score

App State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 1. Mississippi State: 1. Liberty: 0. Texas Southern: 0. Ohio: 0. Georgia Southern: 2. App State: 1. Arkansas State: 0.5. Texas State: 0.5. Coastal Carolina: 0. South Alabama: 0. UL Monroe: 0. App State: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 8 by 43.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 30.8. Liberty: 1 by 4.2. Texas Southern: 1 by 4.2. Ohio: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Southern: 3 by 32.5. App State: 6 by 35. Arkansas State: 2 by 13.3. Texas State: 1 by 9.2. Coastal Carolina: 1 by 4.2. South Alabama: 2 by 8.3. UL Monroe: 1 by 4.2. App State: 3 by 42.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 10 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 3 · +1.3 vs Wins