Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Texas A&M
Kingsley Keke
DL • 6'4" • 305 lbs • Richmond, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kingsley Keke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.3
Consistency
42.4
Season Value
30.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
15161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kingsley Keke, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Texas A&M. Kingsley Keke shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 19.5 primary output with 31.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 31.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
31.3
Usage
9.6
Consistency
42.4
Best Game by takeover score
NC State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 2. Unknown: 0. Clemson: 0.5. UL Monroe: 3. Alabama: 1. Arkansas: 3.5. Kentucky: 4. South Carolina: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Auburn: 2. Ole Miss: 0. UAB: 1. LSU: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Clemson: 4 by 21.7. UL Monroe: 5 by 50.8. Alabama: 4 by 26.7. Arkansas: 4 by 51.7. Kentucky: 5 by 60.8. South Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 30.8. Auburn: 4 by 36.7. Ole Miss: 3 by 12.5. UAB: 4 by 26.7. LSU: 6 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins1.9 · n=8 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=4 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half2 · n=7 · +1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=6 · -1.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs NC State | W 52-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | vs LSU | W 74-72 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs UAB | W 41-20 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Auburn | L 24-28 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Mississippi State | L 13-28 | 5 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ South Carolina | W 26-23 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Kentucky2+ sacks · Splash game | W 20-14 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Arkansas2+ sacks | W 24-17 | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Alabama | L 23-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs UL MonroeSplash game | W 48-10 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Clemson | L 26-28 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 15 | 27.7 | 6.4 | 15 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 15 | 27.7 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 5.5 | 23.3 | 4.1 | -9.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 5.5 | 23.3 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 19.5 | 31.3 | 9.6 | 14 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 19.5 | 31.3 | 9.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#2
Alabama
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas
3.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#4
UL Monroe
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
19.5 primary output · 31.3 efficiency · 9.6 usage
30.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
30.8
19.5 primary · 31.3 efficiency · 9.6 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
26.8
15 primary · 27.7 efficiency · 6.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8778
George Ranch · Rosenberg, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
142
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.