Player Dossier

2016-2019

Mississippi State

Leo Lewis

LB • 6'2" • 245 lbs • Brookhaven, MS, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Leo Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.4 disruption score.

Usage Score

7.6

Efficiency

27.4

Consistency

38.3

Season Value

21.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Mississippi State

16161717181919

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Mississippi State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: LSU

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Leo Lewis, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Mississippi State. Leo Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.4 disruption score.

Leo Lewis played LB for Mississippi State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Leo Lewis recorded 235 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Mississippi State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Mississippi State paired 8.5 primary output with 27.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 27.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: LSU

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Mississippi State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

27.4

Usage

7.6

Consistency

38.3

Best Game by takeover score

Louisville

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 0. Louisiana: 0. Southern Miss: 0.5. Kansas State: 1.5. Kentucky: 0. Auburn: 1. Tennessee: 0. LSU: 2.5. Texas A&M: 0. Arkansas: 0.5. Alabama: 0.5. Unknown: 1. Ole Miss: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana: 6 by 25. Southern Miss: 5 by 25.8. Kansas State: 12 by 65. Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. Auburn: 8 by 43.3. Tennessee: 3 by 12.5. LSU: 7 by 54.2. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. Arkansas: 2 by 13.3. Alabama: 4 by 21.7. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Ole Miss: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 7 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · Games = 7 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

LSU

Best efficiency game

65 vs Kansas State

Result
Mon 12/30@ LouisvilleL 28-3820000
Fri 11/29vs Ole MissW 21-2042100
Sun 11/24vs Unknown50001
Sat 11/16vs AlabamaL 7-38410.5000
Sat 11/2@ ArkansasW 54-24200.5000
Sat 10/26@ Texas A&ML 30-4940000
Sat 10/19vs LSUL 13-36721.5010
Sat 10/12@ TennesseeL 10-2032000
Sat 9/28@ AuburnL 23-5687100
Sat 9/21vs KentuckyW 28-1332000
Sat 9/14vs Kansas State10+ tacklesL 24-311210.5001
Sat 9/7vs Southern MissW 38-15500.5000
Sat 8/31@ LouisianaW 38-2866000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Mississippi State

    2016-2019

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2016201620172017201820192019
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2016 PostseasonMississippi State730.76
2016 Regular SeasonMississippi State730.760
2017 PostseasonMississippi State3173.4-4
2017 Regular SeasonMississippi State3173.40
2018 Regular SeasonMississippi State420.751
2019 PostseasonMississippi State8.527.47.64.5
2019 Regular SeasonMississippi State8.527.47.60

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

LSU

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2.5

Primary metric

2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.7 takeover score.

#2

Ole Miss

2.5

Primary metric

Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.5 takeover score.

#3

South Alabama

2

Primary metric

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.3 takeover score.

#4

LSU

1

Primary metric

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.

#5

Kansas State

1.5

Primary metric

Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2019 Postseason · Mississippi State

8.5 primary output · 27.4 efficiency · 7.6 usage

21.2

#2

2019 Regular Season · Mississippi State

21.2

8.5 primary · 27.4 efficiency · 7.6 usage

#3

2016 Postseason · Mississippi State

15.4

7 primary · 30.7 efficiency · 6 usage

Milestones

0

Impact games

1

Splash games

3

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2015 · Rating 0.9684

Brookhaven · Brookhaven, MS

Committed To
Mississippi State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2015

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

235

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.