Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 1,287 primary output with 57.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 13 | 92 | 75 | 17 | 1 | 57.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 13 | 695 | 607 | 88 | 7 | 57.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 10 | 669 | 492 | 177 | 6 | 56.9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 12 | 882 | 811 | 71 | 6 | 62.2 |
| 2018 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 12 | 91 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 81.4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 12 | 1,196 | 959 | 237 | 10 | 81.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 1,287 primary output with 57.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia State
Win with 154 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
107.3
Efficiency
57.2
Usage
32.2
Consistency
76.4
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Eastern Michigan: 91. South Carolina State: 44. Massachusetts: 141. Clemson: 27. Arkansas State: 159. South Alabama: 104. Texas State: 93. App State: 98. UL Monroe: 73. Troy: 155. Coastal Carolina: 148. Georgia State: 154
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Michigan: 23 by 41.2. South Carolina State: 13 by 30.8. Massachusetts: 21 by 69.9. Clemson: 14 by 20.1. Arkansas State: 11 by 100. South Alabama: 14 by 69.9. Texas State: 26 by 37.3. App State: 18 by 56.7. UL Monroe: 17 by 44.7. Troy: 15 by 53.7. Coastal Carolina: 20 by 77.1. Georgia State: 18 by 85.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.