Usage Score
4.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018App State
TE • 6'6" • 262 lbs • Bushnell, FL, USA
Devin Papenheim reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.9
Efficiency
36.7
Consistency
68.2
Season Value
52.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · App State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Papenheim, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · App State. Devin Papenheim reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Devin Papenheim played TE for App State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Devin Papenheim recorded 11 receiving yards and 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with App State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
App State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 36.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
5.5
Efficiency
36.7
Usage
4.9
Consistency
68.2
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 3. Penn State: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Penn State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
App State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | App State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | App State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | App State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | App State | 11 | 36.7 | 4.9 | 11 |
| 2018 Regular Season | App State | 11 | 36.7 | 4.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8
Primary metric
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Texas State
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Idaho
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · App State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2018 Postseason · App State
52.4
11 primary · 36.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · App State
52.4
11 primary · 36.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7733
South Sumter · Bushnell, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
11
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.