Player Stats

Desmond Franklin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
156
TFL
5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
18
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonApp State44-0--036.8
2017 PostseasonApp State124-0--040.2
2017 Regular SeasonApp State124520-3040.2
2018 PostseasonApp State136-0-1057.5
2018 Regular SeasonApp State13452014257.5
2019 PostseasonApp State123-0-1043.2
2019 Regular SeasonApp State124910-9043.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

App State paired 12 primary output with 25.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · App State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

28

Usage

3.7

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Troy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UAB: 1. East Tennessee State: 1. Charlotte: 0. North Carolina: 0. UL Monroe: 0. South Alabama: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. South Carolina: 3. Georgia State: 0. Texas State: 0. Troy: 5. Louisiana: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 3 by 22.5. East Tennessee State: 7 by 39.2. Charlotte: 2 by 8.3. North Carolina: 5 by 20.8. UL Monroe: 6 by 25. South Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Southern: 6 by 25. South Carolina: 2 by 38.3. Georgia State: 4 by 16.7. Texas State: 2 by 8.3. Troy: 5 by 70.8. Louisiana: 8 by 53.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.1 · Games = 11 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -1.1 vs Wins