Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2015-2018Tulsa
Chris Minter
TE • 6'2" • 253 lbs • Temple, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Chris Minter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
56.7
Consistency
50
Season Value
38.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa
1516161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Minter, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa. Chris Minter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Tulsa paired 60 primary output with 60.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
8.5
Efficiency
56.7
Usage
11.1
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 0. SMU: 17
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
All Games8.5 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs SMU
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 60 | 60.8 | 6.2 | 60 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 60 | 60.8 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 19 | 31.7 | 7.3 | -41 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 17 | 56.7 | 11.1 | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22
Primary metric
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
Central Michigan
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
60 primary output · 60.8 efficiency · 6.2 usage
61.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
61.2
60 primary · 60.8 efficiency · 6.2 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
38.7
17 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 11.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7726
Temple · Temple, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
96
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.