Usage Score
15.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019Tulsa
Trevis Gipson
DE • 6'4" • 268 lbs • Cedar Hill, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Trevis Gipson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
36.2
Consistency
56.2
Season Value
38.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trevis Gipson, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Tulsa. Trevis Gipson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 23 primary output with 36.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 36.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.9
Efficiency
36.2
Usage
15.1
Consistency
56.2
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 3. San José State: 3.5. Oklahoma State: 0. Wyoming: 3. SMU: 3. Navy: 0. Cincinnati: 2. Memphis: 0. Tulane: 0. UCF: 4. Houston: 4.5. East Carolina: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 4 by 46.7. San José State: 4 by 51.7. Oklahoma State: 4 by 16.7. Wyoming: 6 by 55. SMU: 4 by 46.7. Navy: 1 by 4.2. Cincinnati: 3 by 32.5. Memphis: 5 by 20.8. Tulane: 3 by 12.5. UCF: 3 by 52.5. Houston: 7 by 74.2. East Carolina: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins2.6 · n=4 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · n=8 · -1.1 vs Wins
First Half2.1 · n=6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
74.2 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ East Carolina | W 49-24 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs HoustonSplash game | L 14-24 | 7 | 3 | — | 3.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UCF2+ sacks · Splash game | W 34-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Tulane | L 26-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Memphis | L 41-42 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Cincinnati | L 13-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Navy | L 17-45 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMUSplash game | L 37-43 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs WyomingSplash game | W 24-21 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Oklahoma State | L 21-40 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | @ San José StateSplash game | W 34-16 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Michigan StateSplash game | L 7-28 | 4 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2 | 7.6 | 2.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1.5 | 6.8 | 1.1 | -0.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 14 | 29.7 | 9.3 | 12.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 23 | 36.2 | 15.1 | 9 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.3 takeover score.
#2
Houston
4.5
Primary metric
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.6 takeover score.
#3
UCF
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#4
Wyoming
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
#5
San José State
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Tulsa
23 primary output · 36.2 efficiency · 15.1 usage
38.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
25.6
14 primary · 29.7 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
4.6
2 primary · 7.6 efficiency · 2.1 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
8
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8074
Cedar Hill · Cedar Hill, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
114
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.