Player Stats

Cristian Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
201
TFL
5
Passes defended
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 Regular SeasonTulsa917-0--039.6
2017 Regular SeasonTulsa103710-3040.3
2018 Regular SeasonTulsa21210--043.3
2019 Regular SeasonTulsa12571.50-3049
2020 PostseasonTulsa87-0-1059.6
2020 Regular SeasonTulsa8411.50-3059.6
2021 PostseasonTulsa93-0-1025.8
2021 Regular SeasonTulsa927-0-2025.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Tulsa paired 5.5 primary output with 31.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 17.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Tulsa

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

17.2

Usage

2.5

Consistency

11.1

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Old Dominion: 1. UC Davis: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Houston: 0. Memphis: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Tulane: 0. Temple: 1. SMU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Old Dominion: 3 by 22.5. UC Davis: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas State: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 3 by 12.5. Memphis: 6 by 35. Cincinnati: 6 by 25. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Temple: 5 by 30.8. SMU: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.5 vs Wins