Usage Score
7.5
Player Dossier
2015-2019Tulsa
J.R. Reed
DB • 6'1" • 194 lbs • Frisco, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
J.R. Reed shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
25.4
Consistency
33.5
Season Value
21
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Georgia
15161717181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tulsa • Georgia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
J.R. Reed, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Georgia. J.R. Reed shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Georgia paired 12.5 primary output with 29.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 25.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Georgia.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Georgia
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
25.4
Usage
7.5
Consistency
33.5
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Arkansas State: 0. Notre Dame: 4. Tennessee: 0.5. South Carolina: 0.5. Kentucky: 1. Florida: 1. Missouri: 1. Auburn: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia Tech: 2. LSU: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 4 by 21.7. Arkansas State: 4 by 16.7. Notre Dame: 7 by 69.2. Tennessee: 4 by 21.7. South Carolina: 9 by 42.5. Kentucky: 3 by 22.5. Florida: 2 by 18.3. Missouri: 2 by 18.3. Auburn: 5 by 20.8. Texas A&M: 3 by 12.5. Georgia Tech: 2 by 28.3. LSU: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=10 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=2 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/7 | @ LSU | L 10-37 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Georgia Tech | W 52-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Texas A&M | W 19-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Auburn | W 21-14 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Missouri | W 27-0 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Florida | W 24-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Kentucky | W 21-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs South Carolina | L 17-20 | 9 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Tennessee | W 43-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Notre Dame | W 23-17 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arkansas State | W 55-0 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Vanderbilt | W 30-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2015
Opening stop
- 2
Georgia
2016-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
2015201620172017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Georgia | 12.5 | 29.2 | 7 | 12.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia | 12.5 | 29.2 | 7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Georgia | 7 | 24.6 | 6.3 | -5.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia | 7 | 24.6 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia | 10.5 | 25.4 | 7.5 | 3.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 64.1 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64 takeover score.
#3
Massachusetts
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.6 takeover score.
#4
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#5
App State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Georgia
12.5 primary output · 29.2 efficiency · 7 usage
23.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Georgia
23.2
12.5 primary · 29.2 efficiency · 7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Georgia
21
10.5 primary · 25.4 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7981
Prestonwood Christian · Plano, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
188
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.