Player Stats

Javaris Davis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
145
TFL
10
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
27
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonAuburn115-0-1059.8
2016 Regular SeasonAuburn113261-6059.8
2017 PostseasonAuburn103-0-2036.3
2017 Regular SeasonAuburn10251014236.3
2018 PostseasonAuburn110-0--049.8
2018 Regular SeasonAuburn113720-8049.8
2019 PostseasonAuburn122-0--032.7
2019 Regular SeasonAuburn124110-6032.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Auburn paired 16 primary output with 29.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 23.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Auburn

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

23.3

Usage

4.5

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 1. Oregon: 0. Tulane: 0. Kent State: 0. Texas A&M: 2. Mississippi State: 0. Florida: 3. Arkansas: 1. LSU: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Georgia: 2. Alabama: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 2 by 18.3. Oregon: 4 by 16.7. Tulane: 3 by 12.5. Kent State: 2 by 8.3. Texas A&M: 4 by 36.7. Mississippi State: 3 by 12.5. Florida: 5 by 50.8. LSU: 10 by 41.7. Ole Miss: 4 by 16.7. Georgia: 3 by 32.5. Alabama: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 8 · -1.1 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 4 · +1.1 vs Wins