Usage Score
11.8
Player Dossier
2015-2019Arkansas
Deon Stewart
WR • 5'11" • 161 lbs • Hardy, AR, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Deon Stewart reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
46.5
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
35.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Arkansas
151616171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Arkansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deon Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Arkansas. Deon Stewart reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 404 primary output with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Arkansas
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
13.9
Efficiency
46.5
Usage
11.8
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Colorado State: 0. North Texas: 12. Auburn: 32. Texas A&M: 6. Alabama: 53. Ole Miss: 5. Tulsa: 0. Vanderbilt: 23. LSU: 11. Mississippi State: 13. Missouri: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 0. North Texas: 2 by 40. Auburn: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 1 by 40. Alabama: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 2 by 16.7. Vanderbilt: 2 by 76.7. LSU: 2 by 36.7. Mississippi State: 6 by 14.4. Missouri: 2 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses16.7 · Games = 10
First Half17.2 · Games = 6 · +6.5 vs Second Half
Second Half10.7 · Games = 6 · -6.5 vs First Half
All Games13.9 · Games = 12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | @ Missouri | L 0-38 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Mississippi State | L 6-52 | — | 6 | 13 | 2.9 | 2.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs LSU | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 11 | 1.3 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Vanderbilt | L 31-45 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Tulsa | W 23-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Ole Miss | L 33-37 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Alabama | L 31-65 | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-24 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Auburn | L 3-34 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs North Texas | L 17-44 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Colorado State | L 27-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas | 34 | 100 | 6.7 | 34 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas | 34 | 100 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas | 404 | 77.8 | 18 | 370 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arkansas | 167 | 46.5 | 11.8 | -237 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | -167 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Missouri
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#3
Alabama
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia Tech
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Alabama
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 72.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Arkansas
404 primary output · 77.8 efficiency · 18 usage
61.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Arkansas
35.6
167 primary · 46.5 efficiency · 11.8 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Arkansas
30.5
34 primary · 100 efficiency · 6.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8575
Highland · Hardy, AR
- Committed To
- Arkansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
605
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.