Player Stats

James Nachtigal College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
199
TFL
18.5
Sacks
13.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
5
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonArmy00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonArmy81-0--037.8
2016 Regular SeasonArmy81453.5-1037.8
2017 PostseasonArmy1350.50--077.7
2017 Regular SeasonArmy13987.5533077.7
2018 Regular SeasonArmy12815.55-1152.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Army paired 19 primary output with 47 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 36.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: San José State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Army

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

36.9

Usage

13

Consistency

11.1

Best Game by takeover score

San José State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 0. Liberty: 0. Hawai'i: 2. Oklahoma: 2. Buffalo: 0. San José State: 6. Miami (OH): 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Air Force: 0. Lafayette: 0.5. Colgate: 0. Navy: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 6 by 25. Liberty: 7 by 29.2. Hawai'i: 5 by 40.8. Oklahoma: 5 by 40.8. Buffalo: 5 by 20.8. San José State: 8 by 83.3. Miami (OH): 7 by 29.2. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Air Force: 11 by 45.8. Lafayette: 3 by 17.5. Colgate: 11 by 45.8. Navy: 8 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 10 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · +0.1 vs Wins