Usage / Role
48%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2017Western Michigan
DB • 6'1" • 185 lbs • Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Sam Beal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.5 disruption score.
Usage / Role
48%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
69
Solid production for a defensive back
Reliability
52
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
80
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Western Michigan
Snapshot
Player Story
Sam Beal built his college career from 2015 through 2017 as a defensive back from Grand Rapids, MI wearing No. 1, spending time with Western Michigan. The clearest part of Sam Beal's career was his defensive...
Read the storySam Beal, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Western Michigan. Sam Beal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.5 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Western Michigan | 14 | 8 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 29.3 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 14 | 47 | - | 0 | - | 8 | 0 | 29.3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 11 | 26 | 3 | 0 | - | 10 | 0 | 49.5 |
Related Context
Sam Beal played DB for Western Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Sam Beal recorded 81 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Western Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Western Michigan paired 15 primary output with 23.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 23.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
23.5
Usage
3.9
Consistency
41.8
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 2. Michigan State: 1. Idaho: 1. Wagner: 1. Ball State: 3. Buffalo: 0. Eastern Michigan: 3. Central Michigan: 3. Kent State: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Toledo: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 2 by 28.3. Michigan State: 4 by 26.7. Idaho: 3 by 22.5. Wagner: 1 by 14.2. Ball State: 4 by 46.7. Buffalo: 2 by 8.3. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 50.8. Central Michigan: 0 by 30. Kent State: 0 by 10. Northern Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 4 by 16.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | @ Toledo | L 10-37 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/16 | @ Northern Illinois | L 31-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Kent State | W 48-20 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/2 | vs Central MichiganSplash game | L 28-35 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Eastern MichiganSplash game | W 20-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Buffalo | W 71-68 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Ball StateSplash game | W 55-3 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Wagner | W 49-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Idaho | W 37-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Michigan State | L 14-28 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ USCSplash game | L 31-49 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
Player Story
Sam Beal built his college career from 2015 through 2017 as a defensive back from Grand Rapids, MI wearing No. 1, spending time with Western Michigan. The clearest part of Sam Beal's career was his defensive production: 81 tackles, 3 tackles for loss, 2 interceptions, and 18 passes defended across 25 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Western Michigan. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Sam Beal's production has multiple signals. With 25 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Western Michigan.
The arc is straightforward: Sam Beal moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Michigan
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Western Michigan | 8 | 22.1 | 3.3 | 8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 8 | 22.1 | 3.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 15 | 23.5 | 3.9 | 7 |
#1 Featured game
@ Eastern Michigan
Week 8 · W 20-17 · Conference game
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Havoc Plays
78.3 takeover
3 disruption/tackle impact with 78.3 takeover score.
#2
vs Ball State
Week 5 · W 55-3 · Conference game
3
Havoc Plays
65 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#3
@ USC
Week 1 · L 31-49
2
Havoc Plays
63.6 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 63.6 takeover score.
#4
vs Northern Illinois
Week 6 · W 45-30 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
61.4 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#5
@ Ball State
Week 10 · W 52-20 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
54.7 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Western Michigan
15 primary output · 23.5 efficiency · 3.9 usage
49.5
#2
2016 Postseason · Western Michigan
29.3
8 primary · 22.1 efficiency · 3.3 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Western Michigan
29.3
8 primary · 22.1 efficiency · 3.3 usage
4
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.