Usage Score
3.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Eastern Michigan
Hunter Andrews
DL • 6'4" • 257 lbs • Metamora, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Hunter Andrews shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.7
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
11.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Andrews, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Hunter Andrews shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
18.7
Usage
3.6
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0. Kentucky: 0. Illinois: 2. Unknown: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Toledo: 0. Buffalo: 0. Akron: 2. Northern Illinois: 0. Kent State: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 16.7. Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Central Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Ball State: 3 by 12.5. Western Michigan: 3 by 22.5. Toledo: 6 by 25. Buffalo: 3 by 12.5. Akron: 5 by 40.8. Northern Illinois: 2 by 8.3. Kent State: 5 by 25.8
Split Comparison
Wins1 · n=5 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.1 · n=7 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Pittsburgh | L 30-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Kent State | L 26-34 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/20 | @ Northern Illinois | W 45-17 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Tue 11/12 | @ Akron | W 42-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Buffalo | L 14-43 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Toledo | L 34-37 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Western Michigan | W 34-27 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Ball State | L 23-29 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Central Michigan | L 16-42 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Illinois | W 34-31 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kentucky | L 17-38 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Coastal Carolina | W 30-23 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 1 | 8.5 | 1.5 | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 1 | 8.5 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 5.5 | 18.7 | 3.6 | 4.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 5.5 | 18.7 | 3.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
#2
Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
#3
Toledo
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.8 takeover score.
#4
Western Michigan
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.8 takeover score.
#5
Kent State
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 19 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.1 usage
36.5
#2
2019 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
11.2
5.5 primary · 18.7 efficiency · 3.6 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
11.2
5.5 primary · 18.7 efficiency · 3.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7783
Lapeer · Lapeer, MI
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
65
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.