Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2015-2018Buffalo
DE • 6'4" • 265 lbs • Southfield, MI, USA
Chuck Harris shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
29.8
Consistency
24.3
Season Value
21.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chuck Harris, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Buffalo. Chuck Harris shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.8 disruption score.
Chuck Harris played DE for Buffalo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chuck Harris recorded 136 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Buffalo paired 15 primary output with 29.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
29.8
Usage
10.4
Consistency
24.3
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Temple: 2. Eastern Michigan: 6. Rutgers: 3.5. Army: 2. Central Michigan: 0. Akron: 0. Ohio: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Northern Illinois: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 4 by 21.7. Temple: 4 by 36.7. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 83.3. Rutgers: 5 by 55.8. Army: 7 by 49.2. Central Michigan: 6 by 25. Akron: 0 by 0. Ohio: 4 by 16.7. Bowling Green: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 4 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/23 | @ Troy | L 32-42 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Northern Illinois | L 29-30 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Ohio | L 17-52 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Akron | W 24-6 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Central Michigan | W 34-24 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Army | L 13-42 | 7 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ RutgersSplash game | W 42-13 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | W 35-28 | 8 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Temple | W 36-29 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 5 | 12.5 | 4.8 | 5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 11 | 34.2 | 9.7 | 6 |
| 2018 Postseason | Buffalo | 15 | 29.8 | 10.4 | 4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 15 | 29.8 | 10.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 68.7 takeover score.
#2
Bowling Green
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#3
Ball State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#4
Northern Illinois
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47.3 takeover score.
#5
Rutgers
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
15 primary output · 29.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage
21.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · Buffalo
21.2
15 primary · 29.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
18.5
5 primary · 12.5 efficiency · 4.8 usage
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7383
Southfield · Southfield, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
136
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.