Usage Score
20.9
Player Dossier
2015-2019Buffalo
K.J. Osborn
WR • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Ypsilanti, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
K.J. Osborn reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.5
Consistency
66.1
Season Value
54.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Buffalo
15161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Buffalo • Miami
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
K.J. Osborn, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Buffalo. K.J. Osborn reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Buffalo paired 892 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Buffalo, Miami.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Miami
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
42.1
Efficiency
67.5
Usage
20.9
Consistency
66.1
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 56. Florida: 41. North Carolina: 76. Unknown: 58. Central Michigan: 6. Virginia Tech: 44. Virginia: 60. Georgia Tech: 39. Pittsburgh: 94. Florida State: 21. Louisville: 5. Florida International: 25. Duke: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 74.7. Florida: 4 by 68.3. North Carolina: 7 by 72.4. Unknown: 4 by 96.7. Central Michigan: 1 by 40. Virginia Tech: 3 by 97.8. Virginia: 4 by 100. Georgia Tech: 4 by 65. Pittsburgh: 6 by 100. Florida State: 3 by 46.7. Louisville: 3 by 11.1. Florida International: 3 by 55.6. Duke: 3 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Wins37.2 · n=5 · -6.1 vs Losses
Losses43.3 · n=7 · +6.1 vs Wins
First Half48.7 · n=7 · +14.4 vs Second Half
Second Half34.3 · n=6 · -14.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 0-14 | — | 5 | 56 | 10 | 11.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Duke | L 17-27 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Florida International | L 24-30 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Louisville | W 52-27 | — | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 1.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Florida State | W 27-10 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Pittsburgh | W 16-12 | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Georgia Tech | L 21-28 | — | 4 | 39 | 7.2 | 9.80 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Virginia | W 17-9 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Virginia Tech | L 35-42 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Central Michigan | W 17-12 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ North Carolina | L 25-28 | — | 7 | 76 | 10.1 | 10.90 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 8/24 | @ Florida | L 20-24 | — | 4 | 41 | 8.6 | 10.30 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2015-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Miami
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 105 | 70 | 6.7 | 105 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 493 | 81.4 | 15.1 | 388 |
| 2018 Postseason | Buffalo | 892 | 85.9 | 24.2 | 399 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 892 | 85.9 | 24.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Miami | 547 | 67.5 | 20.9 | -345 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami | 547 | 67.5 | 20.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
188
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
188 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
138
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ball State
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
892 primary output · 85.9 efficiency · 24.2 usage
67.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Buffalo
67.6
892 primary · 85.9 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Miami
54.5
547 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 20.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7852
IMG Academy · Bradenton, FL
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,037
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.