Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019SMU
DE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Irving, TX, USA
Delontae Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.6
Efficiency
33.3
Consistency
64.6
Season Value
44.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Delontae Scott, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · SMU. Delontae Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.3 disruption score.
Delontae Scott played DE for SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Delontae Scott recorded 97 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
SMU paired 27 primary output with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.1
Efficiency
33.3
Usage
10.6
Consistency
64.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 1. Arkansas State: 5. North Texas: 1. Texas State: 2. TCU: 2. South Florida: 2. Tulsa: 0. Temple: 0. Houston: 2. Memphis: 3. East Carolina: 2. Navy: 2. Tulane: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 14.2. Arkansas State: 5 by 70.8. North Texas: 4 by 26.7. Texas State: 5 by 40.8. TCU: 2 by 28.3. South Florida: 3 by 32.5. Tulsa: 0 by 0. Temple: 2 by 8.3. Houston: 2 by 28.3. Memphis: 4 by 46.7. East Carolina: 1 by 24.2. Navy: 7 by 49.2. Tulane: 3 by 62.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 28-52 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Tulane2+ sacks · Splash game | W 37-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ NavySplash game | L 28-35 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs East Carolina | W 59-51 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ MemphisSplash game | L 48-54 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/24 | @ Houston | W 34-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Temple | W 45-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Tulsa | W 43-37 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ South Florida | W 48-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ TCUSplash game | W 41-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Texas State | W 47-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs North Texas | W 49-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Arkansas StateSplash game | W 37-30 | 5 | 4 | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 2.5 | 18.1 | 5.8 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | SMU | 8.5 | 20.5 | 8.1 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | SMU | 8.5 | 20.5 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 16 | 32.6 | 9.7 | 7.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | SMU | 27 | 33.3 | 10.6 | 11 |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 27 | 33.3 | 10.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 67.4 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.
#3
Tulane
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.
#4
Tulane
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#5
Memphis
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · SMU
27 primary output · 33.3 efficiency · 10.6 usage
44.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · SMU
44.4
27 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 10.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · SMU
38.6
16 primary · 32.6 efficiency · 9.7 usage
1
Impact games
7
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7893
Nimitz · Irving, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
97
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.