Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2015-2019Utah
TE • 6'6" • 260 lbs • Comanche, TX, USA
Hunter Thedford reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.9
Efficiency
40
Consistency
19.4
Season Value
24.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Thedford, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · SMU. Hunter Thedford reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Hunter Thedford played TE for SMU and Utah. Across 5 tracked seasons, Hunter Thedford recorded 48 receiving yards and 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
SMU paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across SMU, Utah.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
4
Efficiency
40
Usage
5.9
Consistency
19.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 1. Washington State: 11. Arizona: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Washington State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2015-2018
Opening stop
Utah
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 36 | 60 | 5.4 | 36 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah | 12 | 40 | 5.9 | -24 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Primary metric
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
1 receiving yards with a 6.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · SMU
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2017 Regular Season · SMU
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · SMU
50.1
36 primary · 60 efficiency · 5.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8003
Comanche · Comanche, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
48
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.