Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2016-2019Memphis
Joey Magnifico
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Cordova, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Joey Magnifico reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.8
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
58.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Memphis
1617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joey Magnifico, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Memphis. Joey Magnifico reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Memphis paired 363 primary output with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Memphis
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
37.2
Efficiency
68.8
Usage
10.8
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 74. South Alabama: 58. UL Monroe: 48. Temple: 87. Tulane: 31. Tulsa: 5. SMU: 30. Houston: -1. Cincinnati: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. South Alabama: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 2 by 100. Temple: 6 by 96.7. Tulane: 3 by 68.9. Tulsa: 1 by 33.3. SMU: 2 by 100. Houston: 1 by 0. Cincinnati: 1 by 20
Split Comparison
Wins24.9 · n=7
First Half59.6 · n=5 · +50.4 vs Second Half
Second Half9.3 · n=4 · -50.4 vs First Half
All Games37.2 · n=9
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 34-24 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Houston | W 45-27 | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs SMU | W 54-48 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa | W 42-41 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Tulane | W 47-17 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Temple | L 28-30 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UL Monroe | W 52-33 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Alabama | W 42-6 | — | 1 | 58 | 58 | 58 | 0 | 58 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 0 | 45 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 85 | 64.8 | 5.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 280 | 85.7 | 9.6 | 195 |
| 2018 Postseason | Memphis | 363 | 74.8 | 9.4 | 83 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Memphis | 363 | 74.8 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Memphis | 335 | 68.8 | 10.8 | -28 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
74
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Memphis
363 primary output · 74.8 efficiency · 9.4 usage
60.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · Memphis
60.2
363 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Memphis
58.7
335 primary · 68.8 efficiency · 10.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.76
St. Benedict at Auburndale · Cordova, TN
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,063
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.