Player Stats

Tony Pollard College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,220
Rushing yards
942
Receiving yards
1,278
Touchdowns
31

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonMemphis00000-
2016 PostseasonMemphis1386581148
2016 Regular SeasonMemphis13371154217648
2017 PostseasonMemphis1343835056.6
2017 Regular SeasonMemphis137232225011456.6
2018 PostseasonMemphis141131130267.2
2018 Regular SeasonMemphis14884440444867.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Memphis paired 997 primary output with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Win with 199 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Memphis

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

71.2

Efficiency

72.5

Usage

12.8

Consistency

59.9

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 113. Mercer: 13. Navy: 6. Georgia State: 64. South Alabama: 52. Tulane: 30. UConn: 64. UCF: 74. Missouri: 105. East Carolina: 116. Tulsa: 66. SMU: 44. Houston: 199. UCF: 51

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 18 by 65.4. Mercer: 3 by 49.3. Navy: 1 by 62.5. Georgia State: 7 by 72.5. South Alabama: 6 by 86.1. Tulane: 3 by 41.7. UConn: 7 by 79.8. UCF: 11 by 64.3. Missouri: 9 by 98.6. East Carolina: 12 by 90.3. Tulsa: 9 by 44.1. SMU: 4 by 95.8. Houston: 19 by 90.8. UCF: 8 by 73.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins77.3 · Games = 8 · +14.1 vs Losses
Losses63.2 · Games = 6 · -14.1 vs Wins