Usage Score
14.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Memphis
WR • 6'1" • 191 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Kedarian Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.2
Efficiency
82.2
Consistency
62.5
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Memphis
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kedarian Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Memphis. Kedarian Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Memphis paired 609 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
43.5
Efficiency
82.2
Usage
14.2
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 73. Ole Miss: 14. Unknown: 75. South Alabama: 17. Navy: 36. UL Monroe: 18. Temple: 75. Tulane: 15. Tulsa: 47. SMU: 9. Houston: 60. South Florida: 99. Cincinnati: 53. Cincinnati: 18
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 4 by 100. Ole Miss: 2 by 46.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 56.7. Navy: 4 by 60. UL Monroe: 2 by 60. Temple: 4 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 100. SMU: 1 by 60. Houston: 6 by 66.7. South Florida: 6 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Penn State | L 39-53 | — | 4 | 73 | 15 | 18.30 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 29-24 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 34-24 | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ South Florida | W 49-10 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Houston | W 45-27 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs SMU | W 54-48 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa | W 42-41 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Tulane | W 47-17 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Temple | L 28-30 | — | 4 | 75 | 16.6 | 18.80 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UL Monroe | W 52-33 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 9/27 | vs Navy | W 35-23 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Alabama | W 42-6 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 75 | 37.5 | 37.50 | 0 | 65 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Ole Miss | W 15-10 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Memphis
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 121 | 89.2 | 7.5 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Memphis | 152 | 85.8 | 5 | 31 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 152 | 85.8 | 5 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Memphis | 90 | 60 | 8.3 | -62 |
| 2019 Postseason | Memphis | 609 | 82.2 | 14.2 | 519 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Memphis | 609 | 82.2 | 14.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Memphis
609 primary output · 82.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
64.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Memphis
64.7
609 primary · 82.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Memphis
45.1
152 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7793
Kimball · Dallas, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
972
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kedarian Jones quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit