Player Stats

Duke Shelley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
133
TFL
6
Sacks
1
Passes defended
22
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonKansas State00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonKansas State100-0-1052.1
2016 Regular SeasonKansas State104810-3252.1
2017 PostseasonKansas State125-0--059.9
2017 Regular SeasonKansas State124741-9159.9
2018 Regular SeasonKansas State73310-9063.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Kansas State paired 13 primary output with 38.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 38.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Kansas State

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

1.9

Efficiency

38.2

Usage

7.6

Consistency

72.7

Best Game by takeover score

Oklahoma State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Dakota: 3. Mississippi State: 2. UTSA: 2. West Virginia: 2. Texas: 0. Baylor: 1. Oklahoma State: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Dakota: 8 by 63.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 36.7. UTSA: 3 by 32.5. West Virginia: 2 by 28.3. Texas: 6 by 25. Baylor: 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma State: 6 by 55

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.7 · Games = 3 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 4 · -1.4 vs Wins